AI LLMs for trademark law and case law analysis

AI LLMs for trademark law and case law analysis

Large language models (LLMs) can be very useful tools for legal research and analysis, including in the area of trademark law. However, there are some key shortcomings and limitations that need to be considered when using LLMs for tasks involving case law analysis for trademarks:
Response to Trademark BOLIDO Office Action - Likelihood of Confusion rejection example

Response to Trademark BOLIDO Office Action - Likelihood of Confusion rejection example

Response to Trademark BOLIDO Office Action - Likelihood of Confusion rejection example

LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION REFUSAL
The Examining Attorney has refused registration of Applicant’s standard character
BOLIDO mark pursuant to Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d), on the ground that the mark is likely to be confused with METEOR in Registration No. 5,109,381. For the following reasons, Applicant respectfully disagrees with this finding and requests that the Examining Attorney reconsider the statutory refusal and allow registration of Applicant’s mark.

Reply to Apple's Trademark Garage Band - Likelihood of Confusion rejection

Reply to Apple's Trademark Garage Band - Likelihood of Confusion rejection

Response text of Apple's Trademark Garage Band - Likelihood of Confusion rejection. This was a sale of the trademark, and definitely the company Evolution Artists, Inc. and the CEO Ali Partovi did not ask nearly enough. When Arent Fox comes knocking, you should double the price!
Response to Office action of Apple Inc. IPHONE Trademark Likelihood of Confusion office action example 2007 (PART II Response)

Response to Office action of Apple Inc. IPHONE Trademark Likelihood of Confusion office action example 2007 (PART II Response)

Response to Office action of Apple Inc. IPHONE Trademark Likelihood of Confusion office action example 2007 (PART II Response)