Your cart is empty now.
Is Trampoline a Brand Name? The Genericide of a Generic Trademark Explained
- 18 April, 2026
- Nyall Engfield
Can you imagine going to a sporting goods store and asking for a "Kleenex" to blow your nose? That's a trademark that's in danger of becoming a generic term. But what about the trampoline in your backyard? Is that a brand name, or is it just the name of the product itself? The story of the trampoline is a fascinating case study in trademark law—a classic tale of a brand name that soared to success but ultimately fell victim to its own popularity.
🏆 From a "Bouncing Rig" to a Trademark
The modern trampoline was invented in the 1930s by George Nissen, an American gymnast and diver. Inspired by circus trapeze artists bouncing in safety nets, Nissen built his first "bouncing rig" in his parents' garage. After graduating from the University of Iowa, he and his coach, Larry Griswold, formed the Griswold-Nissen Trampoline & Tumbling Company and began selling the devices commercially.
While on tour in Mexico, Nissen heard the Spanish word for diving board: el trampolín. He anglicised it to "trampoline" and registered it as a trademark for his revolutionary bouncing apparatus.
⚖️ The Legal Fallout: The "Genericide" of a Brand
The very success of the device spelled the end for the trademark. As trampolining became a popular sport and backyard activity, the public began using the word "trampoline" to refer to any piece of rebound tumbling equipment, regardless of who manufactured it. This is a process known as "genericide".
By the late 1950s, Nissen found itself in a legal battle. In a landmark case, Nissen Trampoline Co. v. American Trampoline Co. , a court ruled that "trampoline" had become a generic term, finding that the public and even Nissen's competitors used the word to describe a type of product, not just a specific brand. The company’s trademark registration was deemed invalid and was cancelled.
❓ What is "Genericide" and Why Does it Matter?
Trademark law grants companies the exclusive right to use a name, logo, or phrase to identify their products. This protection is crucial for building a brand. However, if a trademark becomes so successful that it replaces the common name for the product itself—like "Escalator" or "Aspirin"—it can lose its legal protection and become a generic term available for anyone to use.
The "trampoline" ruling set a powerful legal precedent. It served as a warning to all brand owners: even a registered trademark is vulnerable if it isn't carefully protected from becoming a household word.
🔎 The Legacy: Trampoline Today
Today, George Nissen's legacy lives on in every bounce. While his name is still synonymous with the device, the word "trampoline" is universally accepted as a generic term, like "escalator" or "laundromat". You can find dozens of brands selling "trampolines" in any major store, a direct result of the product's overwhelming popularity and the legal outcome of genericide.
💡 A Lesson in Brand Protection
The story of the trampoline is a powerful reminder that success can sometimes be a double-edged sword for a brand owner. It's a tale of innovation, popularity, and the ultimate sacrifice of a trademark for the sake of a product that became a global phenomenon. So, the next time you see a trampoline, you'll know that you're not just looking at a fun piece of backyard equipment—you're looking at a former brand name that bounced its way into the dictionary.
Search
Archive
- May 2026
-
- TTAB Trial Tactics #6: The Final Decision – Appeals, Settlements After Trial, and Enforcement
- TTAB Trial Tactics #5: Preparing for Trial – Testimony, Exhibits, and the Trial Brief
- TTAB Trial Tactics #4: Summary Judgment – When to Move, When to Oppose, and How to Win Without a Trial
- TTAB Trial Tactics #3: Discovery – Interrogatories, Document Requests, and Depositions (Without Breaking the Bank)
- TTAB Trial Tactics #2: The Answer – How to Respond When You Are the Defendant
